Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium B960

CPUBoss Winner
Front view of Intel Pentium B960

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium B960

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium B960

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,637 vs 827 Around 3.2x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Significantly higher clock speed 2.2 GHz vs 1.3 GHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Significantly newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 40 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score 1,575 vs 512 More than 3x better geekbench 3 single core score
Significantly higher GPU clock speed 650 MHz vs 488 MHz Around 35% higher GPU clock speed
Significantly more l3 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l3 cache per core
Better PassMark score 1,859 vs 614 More than 3x better PassMark score
Slightly better performance per watt 2.98 pt/W vs 2.34 pt/W More than 25% better performance per watt
Front view of AMD E 300

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 300

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Lower typical power consumption 14.63W vs 28.44W Around 50% lower typical power consumption
Higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 85 °C More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Lower annual home energy cost 4.34 $/year vs 8.43 $/year Around 50% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 15.77 $/year vs 30.66 $/year Around 50% lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium B960 vs E 300

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium B960
2,755
E 300
896

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium B960
1,575
E 300
512

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium B960
108,800 MB/s
E 300
41,900 MB/s

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium B960
2,637
E 300
827

GeekBench (64-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium B960
2,954
E 300
882

GeekBench

Pentium B960
4,781
E 300
1,233

PassMark Data courtesy Passmark

Pentium B960
1,859
E 300
614

PassMark (Single Core)

Pentium B960
1,054
E 300
342

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium B960  vs
E 300 
Clock speed 2.2 GHz 1.3 GHz
Cores Dual core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Memory type
DDR3-1333
DDR3-1066
DDR3

details

Pentium B960  vs
E 300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
L3 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L3 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 22 5
Operating temperature Unknown - 85°C Unknown - 90°C

integrated graphics

GPU GPU GPU
Label Intel® HD Graphics Radeon™ HD 6310
GPU clock speed 650 MHz 488 MHz

power consumption

TDP 35W 18W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 15.77 $/year
Performance per watt 2.98 pt/W 2.34 pt/W
Typical power consumption 28.44W 14.63W
Intel Pentium B960
Report a correction
AMD E 300
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus