Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium B950

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium B950

Report a correction
Significantly lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 52.81W More than 45% lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 15.66 $/year More than 45% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 56.94 $/year More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E2 E2-3250

Reasons to consider the
AMD E2 E2-3250

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Features Key features of the Pentium B950  vs E2 E2-3250 

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium B950  vs
E2 E2-3250 
Cores Dual core Dual core
Socket type
rPGA 988A
FM1

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
3DNow!
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Pentium B950  vs
E2 E2-3250 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 32 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

TDP 35W 65W
Annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year 56.94 $/year
Typical power consumption 28.44W 52.81W
Intel Pentium B950
Report a correction
AMD E2 E2-3250
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus