Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 987

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 987

Report a correction
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 722

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 722

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron M 722 vs the Pentium 987.

Features Key features of the Pentium 987  vs Celeron M 722 

clock speed

Pentium 987
1.5 GHz
Celeron M 722
1.2 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 987  vs
Celeron M 722 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Dual core Single core
Socket type
BGA 1023
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

bus

Architecture DMI FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium 987  vs
Celeron M 722 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 0.5 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 32 nm 45 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU GPU None
Label Intel® HD Graphics N/A
Number of displays supported 2 N/A
GPU clock speed 350 MHz N/A
Turbo clock speed 1,000 MHz N/A

power consumption

TDP 17W 5.5W
Annual home energy cost 4.1 $/year 1.32 $/year
Typical power consumption 13.81W 4.47W
Intel Pentium 987
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 722
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus