0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 370 |
Released May, 2004
Intel Pentium 755
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 755
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released January, 2005
Intel Celeron M 370
- 1.5 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 370
![]() | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits |
Features Key features of the Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 370
clock speed
Pentium 755
2 GHz
Celeron M 370
1.5 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 755
2 MB
Celeron M 370
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 755
2.35 GHz
Celeron M 370
2.1 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 755
2 GHz
Celeron M 370
1.5 GHz
TDP
Pentium 755
7.5W
Celeron M 370
21W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 7.5W | 21W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 17.06W | |
memory controller | |||
Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
Supports ECC | No | No |
details | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
Threads | 1 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 20 | 15 | |
Voltage range | 0.99 - 1.34V | 1 - 1.29V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.35 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.35 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz |
Intel Pentium 755 ![]() | Intel Celeron M 370 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel Pentium 765 vs 755 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel Celeron M 360 vs Pentium 755 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$116 | ||
Intel Pentium 770 vs Celeron M 370 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$116 | ||
Intel Core Duo T2050 vs Celeron M 370 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$32 | $116 | |
Intel Atom N270 vs Celeron M 370 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$116 | ||
Intel Pentium 765 vs Celeron M 370 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $116 | |
Intel Core i3 370M vs Celeron M 370 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||