Intel Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 370 |
Released May, 2004
Intel Pentium 755
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 755
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released January, 2005
Intel Celeron M 370
- 1.5 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 370
| | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 370
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| 478 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 21W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 17.06W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 370 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 20 | 15 | |
| Voltage range | 0.99 - 1.34V | 1 - 1.29V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.35 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.5 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.35 GHz | 2.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium 755  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron M 370 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
