Intel Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 360 |
Released May, 2004
Intel Pentium 755
- 2 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 755
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released August, 2004
Intel Celeron M 360
- 1.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron M 360
| | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 755 vs Celeron M 360
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 360 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 21W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 5.06 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 17.06W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Pentium 755 | vs | Celeron M 360 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 144,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 20 | 14 | |
| Voltage range | 0.99 - 1.34V | 1 - 1.29V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.35 GHz | 4.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2 GHz | 1.4 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.35 GHz | 4.83 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 400 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium 755  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron M 360 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 755 vs 765 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $103 | ||
| 755 vs 370 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $250 | ||
| 360 vs 2520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $197 | ||
| 360 vs T7250 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 360 vs 770 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $32 | ||
| 360 vs N270 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $48 | ||
| 360 vs 440 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
