Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 755

Front view of Intel Pentium 755
Front view of Intel Celeron M 330

Intel Celeron M 330

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 755

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 755

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Higher clock speed 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 45% higher clock speed
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 19.91W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.35 GHz vs 1.9 GHz Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 45% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 5.9 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 21.46 $/year 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Celeron M 330

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 330

Report a correction
Newer Jun, 2004 vs May, 2004 Release date 1 months later

Features Key features of the Pentium 755  vs Celeron M 330 

clock speed

Pentium 755
2 GHz
Celeron M 330
1.4 GHz

L2 cache

Pentium 755
2 MB
Celeron M 330
0.5 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 755
2.35 GHz
Celeron M 330
1.9 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 755
2 GHz
Celeron M 330
1.4 GHz

TDP

Pentium 755
7.5W
Celeron M 330
24.5W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium 755  vs
Celeron M 330 
Clock speed 2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479
478

features
Has a NX bit No No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 7.5W 24.5W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 5.9 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 21.46 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 19.91W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 400 MHz 400 MHz

details

 Pentium 755  vs
Celeron M 330 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Transistor count 144,000,000 77,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 20 14

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 2.35 GHz 1.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 2 GHz 1.4 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 2.35 GHz 1.9 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Pentium 755
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 330
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss