Intel Pentium 745 vs Celeron Mendocino |
Released May, 2004
Intel Pentium 745
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 745
 | Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm | | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Much higher clock speed 1.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 90 nm | vs | 250 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | Around 15.5x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 1.8 GHz | vs | 0.4 GHz | Around 4.5x higher clock speed | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | Around 15.5x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Newer | May, 2004 | vs | Aug, 1998 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
| Lower typical power consumption | 6.09W | vs | 19.26W | 3.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Lower annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | vs | 5.71 $/year | 3.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | vs | 20.76 $/year | 3.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Celeron Mendocino vs the Pentium 745. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 745 vs Celeron Mendocino
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 745 | vs | Celeron Mendocino |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 0.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 479 | |||
| 370 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 66 MHz | |
details | Pentium 745 | vs | Celeron Mendocino |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.13 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 250 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 19,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 6 | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 23.7W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 5.71 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | 20.76 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 19.26W | |
 Intel Pentium 745  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron Mendocino Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
