0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 745 vs Celeron 1000M |
VS
Released January, 2013
Intel Celeron 1000M
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Celeron 1000M
![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes | ![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 745 vs the Celeron 1000M. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Features Key features of the Pentium 745 vs Celeron 1000M
clock speed
Pentium 745
1.8 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 745
2 MB
Celeron 1000M
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 745
2.34 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 745
1.8 GHz
Celeron 1000M
1.8 GHz
TDP
Pentium 745
7.5W
Celeron 1000M
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 745 | vs | Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
479 | |||
rPGA 988B | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 7.5W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium 745 | vs | Celeron 1000M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 1 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 18 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 2.34 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.8 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.34 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,000 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 400 MHz | 100 MHz |
Intel Pentium 745 ![]() | Intel Celeron 1000M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1000M vs 2328M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $244 | |
1000M vs B960 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $134 | |
1000M vs 2020M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1000M vs 1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | ||
1000M vs 1200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $246 | |
1000M vs B800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $86 | |
1000M vs B830 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||