Intel Pentium 738 vs Atom D2550 |
Released July, 2004
Intel Pentium 738
- 1.4 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 738
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released March, 2012
Intel Atom D2550
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Atom D2550
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| |||||||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 738 vs Atom D2550
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 738 | vs | Atom D2550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.4 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 10W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 2.41 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 8.13W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Pentium 738 | vs | Atom D2550 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 0.99 - 1.12V | 0.91 - 1.21V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.64 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.4 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.64 GHz | 1.87 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Integrated | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 640 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
 Intel Pentium 738  Report a correction |  Intel Atom D2550 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $63 | $47 | |
| Intel Atom D525 vs D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $82 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron J1900 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $47 | ||
| AMD G G-T48E vs Intel Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $47 | |
| Intel Core i3 3220 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $75 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron 1037U vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $72 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron J1800 vs Atom D2550 | ||
 | VS | |
| $134 | $47 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Atom D2550 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
