Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 738

Front view of Intel Pentium 738
Front view of AMD E 450

AMD E 450

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 738

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 738

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Lower typical power consumption 6.09W vs 14.63W 2.4x lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year vs 4.34 $/year 2.4x lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year vs 15.77 $/year 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD E 450

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 450

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Higher clock speed 1.65 GHz vs 1.4 GHz Around 20% higher clock speed
Newer Aug, 2011 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Pentium 738  vs E 450 

clock speed

Pentium 738
1.4 GHz
E 450
1.65 GHz

L2 cache

Pentium 738
2 MB
E 450
1 MB

TDP

Pentium 738
7.5W
E 450
18W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium 738  vs
E 450 
Clock speed 1.4 GHz 1.65 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
479
Super 7

features
Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

memory controller
Memory controller Built-in Built-in

bus
Clock speed 400 MHz 100 MHz

details

 Pentium 738  vs
E 450 
Threads 1 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 14 25

integrated graphics
GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6320
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 508 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 600 MHz

power consumption
TDP 7.5W 18W
Annual home energy cost 1.81 $/year 4.34 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 6.57 $/year 15.77 $/year
Typical power consumption 6.09W 14.63W
Intel Pentium 738
Report a correction
AMD E 450
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss