Intel Pentium 725 vs Core Duo T2050 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Core Duo T2050
- 1.6 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core Duo T2050
 | Has a NX bit Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 725 vs the Core Duo T2050. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 725 vs Core Duo T2050
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 725 | vs | Core Duo T2050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| 478 | |||
| 479 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 7.5W | 31W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 6.09W | 25.19W | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Pentium 725 | vs | Core Duo T2050 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86 | |
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 144,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 16 | 12 | |
| Voltage range | 0.99 - 1.34V | 0.76 - 1.3V | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.06 GHz | 2.03 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.6 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 353.6 | 277.7 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.06 GHz | 2.03 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 400 MHz | 533 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium 725  Report a correction |  Intel Core Duo T2050 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| AMD FX 9590 vs Intel Core i7 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs i5 6600K | ||
