Intel Pentium 718 vs Core i7 6700K |
Released April, 2004
Intel Pentium 718
- 1.3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 718
 | Much lower typical power consumption 9.75W | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Much lower annual home energy cost 2.89 $/year | | Much lower annual commercial energy cost 10.51 $/year |
VS
Released July, 2015
Intel Core i7 6700K
- 4 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core i7 6700K
| | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much higher clock speed 4 GHz |
| | More advanced architecture x86-64 | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
by PCMagOverall performance is better than any other CPU on the market, save for Extreme Edition models.
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 9.75W | vs | 73.94W | 7.6x lower typical power consumption | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 2.89 $/year | vs | 21.92 $/year | 7.6x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 10.51 $/year | vs | 79.72 $/year | 7.6x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 130 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Much higher clock speed | 4 GHz | vs | 1.3 GHz | More than 3x higher clock speed | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2004 | Release date over 11 years later | |||
| More threads | 8 | vs | 1 | 7 more threads | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 718 vs Core i7 6700K
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 718 | vs | Core i7 6700K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.3 GHz | 4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| AVX 2.0 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
details | Pentium 718 | vs | Core i7 6700K |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 8 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 130 nm | 14 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 530 | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 350 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,150 MHz | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 12W | 91W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 2.89 $/year | 21.92 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 10.51 $/year | 79.72 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 9.75W | 73.94W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 0 | |
 Intel Pentium 718  Report a correction |  Intel Core i7 6700K Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $390 | |
| 6700K vs 5820K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $305 | |
| 6700K vs 6700 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $128 | |
| 6700K vs 8350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
