Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 705

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 705

Report a correction
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Front view of Intel Celeron M 360

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 360

Report a correction
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits

Features Key features of the Pentium 705  vs Celeron M 360 

clock speed

Pentium 705
1.5 GHz
Celeron M 360
1.4 GHz

L2 cache

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 705  vs
Celeron M 360 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 1.4 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
479

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 24.5W 21W
Annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year 5.06 $/year
Typical power consumption 19.91W 17.06W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 400 MHz 400 MHz

details

Pentium 705  vs
Celeron M 360 
Architecture x86 x86
Threads 1 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 77,000,000 144,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 14
Voltage range 0.96 - 1.48V 1 - 1.29V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No No
Intel Pentium 705
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 360
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus