Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 705

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 705

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 19.91W vs 159.66W 8x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year vs 56.1 $/year 9.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year vs 159.62 $/year 7.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of AMD FX 8350

Reasons to consider the
AMD FX 8350

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 8 MB vs 1 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 130 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 4 GHz vs 1.5 GHz Around 2.8x higher clock speed
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More cores 8 vs 1 7 more cores; run more applications at once
Newer Oct, 2012 vs Mar, 2003 Release date over 9 years later
More threads 8 vs 1 7 more threads

Features Key features of the Pentium 705  vs FX 8350 

clock speed

Pentium 705
1.5 GHz
FX 8350
4 GHz

L2 cache

FX 8350
8 MB

TDP

Pentium 705
24.5W
FX 8350
125W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 705  vs
FX 8350 
Clock speed 1.5 GHz 4 GHz
Cores Single core Octa core
Socket type
479
AM3+

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
AVX 1.1
SSE2
F16C
MMX
XOP
AVX
SSE3
SSE
ABM
BMI1
CLMUL
AMD64
SSE4.1
FMA4
FMA3
SSE4.2
CVT16
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
AES
TBM
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 24.5W 125W
Annual home energy cost 5.9 $/year 56.1 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 21.46 $/year 159.62 $/year
Typical power consumption 19.91W 159.66W

bus

Clock speed 400 MHz 2,600 MHz

details

Pentium 705  vs
FX 8350 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 1 8
L2 cache 1 MB 8 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 130 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 77,000,000 1,200,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 21
Voltage range 0.96 - 1.48V 0.81 - 1.45V

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

memory controller

Memory controller Built-in Built-in
Supports ECC No Yes
Intel Pentium 705
Report a correction
AMD FX 8350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus