Intel Pentium 4405Y vs Core i5 2500 |
Released July, 2015
Intel Pentium 4405Y
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4405Y
 | Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Much lower typical power consumption 4.88W |
| | Much better performance per watt 14.35 pt/W | | More number of displays supported 3 |
VS
Released January, 2011
Intel Core i5 2500
- 3.3 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 2500
| | Much higher clock speed 3.3 GHz | | Much better performance per dollar 2.86 pt/$ |
| | Much higher GPU clock speed 850 MHz | | More l2 cache 1 MB |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 32 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much lower typical power consumption | 4.88W | vs | 77.19W | 15.8x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 14.35 pt/W | vs | 9.04 pt/W | Around 60% better performance per watt | |||
| More number of displays supported | 3 | vs | 2 | 1 more number of displays supported | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jan, 2011 | Release date over 4 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | vs | 22.89 $/year | 15.8x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | vs | 83.22 $/year | 15.8x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 3.3 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 2.2x higher clock speed | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 2.86 pt/$ | vs | 0.53 pt/$ | More than 5.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Much higher GPU clock speed | 850 MHz | vs | 300 MHz | More than 2.8x higher GPU clock speed | |||
| More l2 cache | 1 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better turbo clock speed | 1,100 MHz | vs | 800 MHz | Around 40% better turbo clock speed | |||
| More l3 cache | 6 MB | vs | 2 MB | 3x more l3 cache; more data can be stored in the l3 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better PassMark (Single core) score | 1,857 | vs | 790 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.7 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Better PassMark score | 6,257 | vs | 2,046 | More than 3x better PassMark score | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.21 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4405Y vs Core i5 2500
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4405Y | vs | Core i5 2500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 14.35 pt/W | 9.04 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium 4405Y | vs | Core i5 2500 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 6 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 32 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 4.21 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 3.7 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | Intel® HD Graphics 2000 | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 850 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,100 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3-1333 | |||
| DDR3-1066 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 21,333.32 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 32,768 MB | |
 Intel Pentium 4405Y  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 2500 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $205 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 2400 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i7 2600 vs i5 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $168 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 3570 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $220 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500K vs 2500 | ||
 | VS | |
| $240 | $300 | |
| Intel Core i7 3770 vs i5 2500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
| | VS | |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS | |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
