Intel Pentium 4405Y vs Atom Z3735F |
Released July, 2015
Intel Pentium 4405Y
- 1.5 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4405Y
 | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm | | Slightly higher clock speed 1.5 GHz |
| | Significantly better turbo clock speed 800 MHz | | Better PassMark (Single core) score 790 |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom Z3735F
- 1.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3735F
| | Much better performance per dollar 7.87 pt/$ | | Much more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | Much better performance per watt 60.81 pt/W | | More cores 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slightly higher clock speed | 1.5 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | Around 15% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly better turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | vs | 646 MHz | Around 25% better turbo clock speed | |||
| Better PassMark (Single core) score | 790 | vs | 350 | More than 2.2x better PassMark (Single core) score | |||
| Better PassMark score | 2,046 | vs | 908 | More than 2.2x better PassMark score | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Apr, 2014 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per dollar | 7.87 pt/$ | vs | 0.53 pt/$ | Around 14.8x better performance per dollar | |||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 60.81 pt/W | vs | 14.35 pt/W | Around 4.2x better performance per watt | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More l2 cache per core | 0.5 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.83 GHz | vs | 1.5 GHz | More than 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4405Y vs Atom Z3735F
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4405Y | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Quad core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 6W | 2.2W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 1.45 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 5.26 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 14.35 pt/W | 60.81 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 4.88W | 1.79W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
details | Pentium 4405Y | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 1.5 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 1.5 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 1.5 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 515 | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 311 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 800 MHz | 646 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3L-1600 | |||
| DDR3L-1333 | |||
| DDR3RS-1333 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Single Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 25,600 MB/s | 6,400 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 16,384 MB | 2,048 MB | |
 Intel Pentium 4405Y  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z3735F Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $21 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom x5 x5-Z8300 vs Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $17 | |
| Intel Celeron N2840 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $17 | |
| Intel Celeron N3050 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | ||
| Intel x5-Z8350 vs Atom Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $32 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom Z3740 vs Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $17 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom Z3735G vs Z3735F | ||
 | VS | |
| $20 | $17 | |
| Intel Atom Z3736F vs Z3735F | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| Intel Core i5 2500 vs Xeon W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| Intel Core i7 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A8 6410 vs Intel Core i5 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 vs Intel Core i5 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| Intel Pentium N3540 vs Core i3 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| AMD A6 5200 vs Intel Core i5 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| Intel Core i3 3217U vs Celeron 847 | ||
