Intel Pentium 4405U vs Core i3 4005U |
Released July, 2015
Intel Pentium 4405U
- 2.1 GHz
- Dual core
8.1 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4405U
 | Higher clock speed 2.1 GHz | | Significantly newer manufacturing process 14 nm |
| | Higher GPU clock speed 300 MHz | | Better geekbench 3 single core score 2,119 |
VS
Released July, 2013
Intel Core i3 4005U
- 1.7 GHz
- Dual core
8 Out of 10
Reasons to buy the Core i3 4005U
| | Much better performance per watt 28.25 pt/W | | Much better performance per dollar 1.54 pt/$ |
| | Better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score 12.5 mPixels/s | | More l3 cache per core 1.5 MB/core |
CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 4405U vs 4005U among all CPUs
Performance | |
Benchmark performance using all cores | |
| PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more | |
Single-core Performance | |
Individual core benchmark performance | |
| PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more | |
Integrated Graphics | |
Integrated GPU performance for graphics | |
| Sky Diver and Cloud Gate | |
Integrated Graphics (OpenCL) | |
Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing | |
| CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more | |
Performance per Watt | |
How efficiently does the processor use electricity? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
Value | |
Are you paying a premium for performance? | |
| Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more | |
No winner declared
Too close to call
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Intel Pentium 4405UCPUBoss Winner |  | |
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Higher clock speed | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | Around 25% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Significantly newer manufacturing process | 14 nm | vs | 22 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Higher GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | vs | 200 MHz | 50% higher GPU clock speed | |||
| Better geekbench 3 single core score | 2,119 | vs | 1,628 | More than 30% better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,463 | vs | 3,389 | More than 30% better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Newer | Jul, 2015 | vs | Jul, 2013 | Release date over 2 years later | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.81 GHz | More than 15% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.1 GHz | vs | 1.7 GHz | Around 25% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much better performance per watt | 28.25 pt/W | vs | 7.25 pt/W | Around 4x better performance per watt | |||
| Much better performance per dollar | 1.54 pt/$ | vs | 0.68 pt/$ | More than 2.2x better performance per dollar | |||
| Better CompuBench 1.5 face detection score | 12.5 mPixels/s | vs | 12.31 mPixels/s | Almost the same | |||
| More l3 cache per core | 1.5 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 50% more l3 cache per core | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4405U vs Core i3 4005U
CompuBench 1.5 (Face detection)
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
PassMark Data courtesy Passmark
PassMark (Single Core)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4405U | vs | Core i3 4005U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Cores | Dual core | Dual core | |
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| AVX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 15W | 15W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 3.61 $/year | 3.61 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 13.14 $/year | 13.14 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 7.25 pt/W | 28.25 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 12.19W | 12.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI 2.0 | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Transfer rate | 4,000 MT/s | 5,000 MT/s | |
details | Pentium 4405U | vs | Core i3 4005U |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 4 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 0.5 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 0.25 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
| L3 cache | 2 MB | 3 MB | |
| L3 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 14 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 2.1 GHz | 1.81 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.1 GHz | 1.7 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 2.1 GHz | 1.81 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | GPU | GPU | |
| Label | Intel® HD Graphics 510 | HD 4400 series | |
| Number of displays supported | 3 | 3 | |
| GPU clock speed | 300 MHz | 200 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | 950 MHz | 950 MHz | |
memory controller | |||
| Memory controller | Built-in | Built-in | |
| Memory type | |||
| DDR3-1866 | |||
| LPDDR3-1600 | |||
| DDR3 | |||
| Channels | Dual Channel | Dual Channel | |
| Supports ECC | No | No | |
| Maximum bandwidth | 29,866.66 MB/s | 12,800 MB/s | |
| Maximum memory size | 32,768 MB | 16,384 MB | |
 Intel Pentium 4405U  Report a correction |  Intel Core i3 4005U Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | $275 | |
| 4005U vs 5005U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | $107 | |
| 4005U vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| 4005U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| 4005U vs 7010 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | ||
| 4005U vs 7110 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs 3558U | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS | |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
| | VS | |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
