0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 672 vs Core i3 3220 |
Released November, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 672
- 3.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 672
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 3.8 GHz |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.8 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2012
Intel Core i3 3220
- 3.3 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 3220
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | More cores 2 | ![]() | More threads 4 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Significantly higher clock speed | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.3 GHz | More than 15% higher clock speed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.8 GHz | vs | 3.43 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70.8 °C | vs | 65.3 °C | Around 10% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.74 GHz | vs | 3.46 GHz | More than 65% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 44.69W | vs | 93.44W | 2.1x lower typical power consumption | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 13.25 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | 2.1x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 48.18 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | 2.1x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Newer | Sep, 2012 | vs | Nov, 2005 | Release date over 6 years later |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 672 vs Core i3 3220
clock speed
Pentium 4 672
3.8 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 672
2 MB
Core i3 3220
0.5 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 672
3.8 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 672
5.74 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 672
115W
Core i3 3220
55W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 672 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.3 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
LGA 1155 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | Yes | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
AVX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 55W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 13.25 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 48.18 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 44.69W |
details | Pentium 4 672 | vs | Core i3 3220 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 19 | 33 | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 70.8°C | Unknown - 65.3°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.74 GHz | 3.46 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.8 GHz | 3.43 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics 2500 | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 3 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 650 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 1,050 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium 4 672 ![]() | Intel Core i3 3220 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5400K vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$50 | $125 | |
5300 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | ||
Q6600 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $125 | |
G2020 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $125 | |
E8400 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$76 | $125 | |
G2030 vs 3220 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$94 | $125 | |
J2900 vs 3220 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||