Intel Pentium 4 661 vs 560 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Pentium 4 661
- 3.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 661
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Has a NX bit Yes |
VS
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the 560 vs the 661. | |||||||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 661 vs 560
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 661 | vs | 560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 86W | 115W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.72 $/year | 27.7 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 75.34 $/year | 100.74 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 69.88W | 93.44W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 661 | vs | 560 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Transistor count | 188,000,000 | 125,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 18 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 1.2 - 1.43V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 1°C | Unknown - 72.8°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.55 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.04 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.55 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 661  Report a correction |  Intel Pentium 4 560 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| 661 vs E5800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $74 | ||
| 661 vs 820 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $163 | ||
| 661 vs 945 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 661 vs E6500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 661 vs E7500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 560 vs 550J | ||
| | VS |  |
| 560 vs 570 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
