0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 661 vs Core2 Duo E4300 |
Released January, 2006
Intel Pentium 4 661
- 3.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 661
![]() | Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz | ![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.55 GHz |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 5.04 GHz |
VS
Released July, 2006
Intel Core2 Duo E4300
- 1.8 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Duo E4300
![]() | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 61.4 °C | ![]() | More cores 2 |
![]() | Significantly lower typical power consumption 52.81W | ![]() | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | 2x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.55 GHz | vs | 3.21 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.04 GHz | vs | 3.6 GHz | More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 61.4 °C | vs | 1 °C | Around 61.5x higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Significantly lower typical power consumption | 52.81W | vs | 69.88W | Around 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 15.66 $/year | vs | 20.72 $/year | Around 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 56.94 $/year | vs | 75.34 $/year | Around 25% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 661 vs Core2 Duo E4300
clock speed
Pentium 4 661
3.6 GHz
Core2 Duo E4300
1.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 661
2 MB
Core2 Duo E4300
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 661
4.55 GHz
Core2 Duo E4300
3.21 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 661
5.04 GHz
Core2 Duo E4300
3.6 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 661
86W
Core2 Duo E4300
65W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 661 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 86W | 65W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.72 $/year | 15.66 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 75.34 $/year | 56.94 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 69.88W | 52.81W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 800 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 661 | vs | Core2 Duo E4300 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 188,000,000 | 167,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 18 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 1°C | Unknown - 61.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.55 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 5.04 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.55 GHz | 3.21 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 661 ![]() | Intel Core2 Duo E4300 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
Intel Pentium 4 661 vs Celeron M 450 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium E5200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | ||
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium E2180 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium E2160 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $72 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Celeron J1800 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium E2200 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$106 | $67 | |
Intel Core2 Duo E4300 vs Pentium E5400 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
Intel Core i5 6600K vs i7 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
Intel Core i7 4770K vs AMD FX 9590 | ||