Intel Pentium 4 660 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
 | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 4 660 vs the Core2 Quad Q6600. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 660 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Cinebench R10 32-Bit
Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)
sysmark 2007 (overall)
sysmark 2007 (3d)
sysmark 2007 (video creation)
sysmark 2007 (productivity)
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 660 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 105W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 660 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 169,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 70.8°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.17 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.07 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.17 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 660  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| E8400 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | ||
| 3220 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| Q8200 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | ||
| Q8400 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | ||
| Q9400 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $287 | ||
| Q9550 vs Q6600 | ||
 | VS | |
| $184 | ||
| 3570K vs Q6600 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
