Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 660

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 660

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz 80% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz vs 2.42 GHz More than 70% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.07 GHz vs 2.42 GHz Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score 2,887 vs 1,079 Around 2.8x better geekbench 2 (32-bit) score
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 93.44W 11.5x lower typical power consumption
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Jan, 2005 Release date over 8 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 27.7 $/year 11.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 100.74 $/year 11.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 660 vs Celeron J1900

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Cinebench R10 32-Bit

Cinebench R10 32-Bit (Single Core)

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 660  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1

details

Pentium 4 660  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 2 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.17 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.07 GHz 2.42 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.17 GHz 2.42 GHz

power consumption

TDP 115W 10W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 8.76 $/year
Typical power consumption 93.44W 8.13W
Intel Pentium 4 660
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus