Intel Pentium 4 641 vs Core2 Quad Q6600 |
VS
Released January, 2007
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600
- 2.4 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q6600
 | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 4 641 vs the Core2 Quad Q6600. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 641 vs Core2 Quad Q6600
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 641 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 2.4 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 86W | 105W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.72 $/year | 25.29 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 75.34 $/year | 91.98 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 69.88W | 85.31W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,066 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 641 | vs | Core2 Quad Q6600 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
| Transistor count | 188,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 16 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 1°C | Unknown - 62.2°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.53 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.64 GHz | 3.6 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.53 GHz | 3.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 641  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Duo E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i3 3220 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Q8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $179 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Q8200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $200 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Q9400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $287 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Q9550 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $184 | ||
| Intel Core2 Quad Q6600 vs Core i5 3570K | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
