0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 641 vs Core2 QX6850 |
VS
Released July, 2007
Intel Core2 QX6850
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core2 QX6850
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 4 641 vs the Core2 QX6850. | |||||||
| |||||||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
---|
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 641 vs Core2 QX6850
clock speed
Pentium 4 641
3.2 GHz
Core2 QX6850
3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 641
2 MB
Core2 QX6850
8 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 641
4.53 GHz
Core2 QX6850
4.02 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 641
4.64 GHz
Core2 QX6850
3.86 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 641
86W
Core2 QX6850
130W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 641 | vs | Core2 QX6850 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.2 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 86W | 130W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.72 $/year | 31.32 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 75.34 $/year | 113.88 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 69.88W | 105.63W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 641 | vs | Core2 QX6850 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 8 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 2 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 65 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 188,000,000 | 582,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 16 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.34V | 0.85 - 1.5V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 1°C | Unknown - 64.5°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.53 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.64 GHz | 3.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.53 GHz | 4.02 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 641 ![]() | Intel Core2 QX6850 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $970 | |
Q9550 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | $970 | |
Q9650 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $970 | |
Q8200 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$970 | ||
Q6600 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$317 | $970 | |
Q9450 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$970 | ||
QX9650 vs QX6850 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$70 | ||
Q6600 vs 641 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||