Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 641

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 641

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Pentium 4 641 vs the AMD Athlon 2800+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 2800+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 2800+

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD Athlon 2800+ vs the Intel Pentium 4 641.

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 641  vs Athlon 2800+ 

clock speed

Pentium 4 641
3.2 GHz
Athlon 2800+
1.8 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 641
4.53 GHz
Athlon 2800+
2.57 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 641
4.64 GHz
Athlon 2800+
2.13 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 641  vs
Athlon 2800+ 
Clock speed 3.2 GHz 1.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
754
462

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 86W 89W
Annual home energy cost 20.72 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 75.34 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 69.88W 72.31W

details

Pentium 4 641  vs
Athlon 2800+ 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 1°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.53 GHz 2.57 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz 2.13 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.53 GHz 2.57 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 266 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 641
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 2800+
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus