Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 631

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 631

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.36 GHz vs 2.02 GHz Around 2.2x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz vs 3.29 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron M 420

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 420

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 69.88W 2.5x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 60.4 °C vs 1 °C Around 60.5x higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 20.72 $/year 2.5x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 75.34 $/year 2.5x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Apr, 2007 vs Jan, 2006 Release date over 1 years later

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 631  vs Celeron M 420 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 631
4.36 GHz
Celeron M 420
2.02 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 631
4.64 GHz
Celeron M 420
3.29 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 631  vs
Celeron M 420 
Clock speed 3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 86W 35W
Annual home energy cost 20.72 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 75.34 $/year 30.66 $/year
Typical power consumption 69.88W 28.44W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz

details

Pentium 4 631  vs
Celeron M 420 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 65 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 188,000,000 105,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 8
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.34V 1 - 1.34V
Operating temperature Unknown - 1°C Unknown - 60.4°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.36 GHz 2.02 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.64 GHz 3.29 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 950.2 1,365.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.36 GHz 2.02 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 631
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 420
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus