Intel Pentium 4 631 vs AMD Sempron 3000+ |
Released January, 2006
Intel Pentium 4 631
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 631
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | | More threads 2 |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
AMD Sempron 3000+
- 1.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 3000+
| | Much higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C | | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.13 MB | 16x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | More than 65% higher clock speed | |||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.13 MB/core | 16x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| |||||||
| Much higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 1 °C | 70x higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 69.88W | Around 30% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 20.72 $/year | Around 30% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 75.34 $/year | Around 30% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 631 vs Sempron 3000+
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 631 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| 754 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 86W | 62W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.72 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 75.34 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 69.88W | 50.38W | |
details | Pentium 4 631 | vs | Sempron 3000+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.13 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.13 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 65 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 1°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 200 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium 4 631  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 3000+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| 3000+ vs 3200+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| Sempron 3000+ vs Athlon 64 3000+ | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | ||
| 631 vs E7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| 631 vs E5300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 631 vs 630 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $72 | ||
| 631 vs E5800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | ||
| 631 vs E2140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
