Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.2 GHz 2.5x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz vs 1.44 GHz Around 2.8x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 1.2 GHz More than 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron SU2300

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron SU2300

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 68.25W 8.4x lower typical power consumption
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Sep, 2009 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 3 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 8.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 8.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron SU2300

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Clock speed 3 GHz 1.2 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
BGA 956

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 10W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 8.76 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 8.13W

details

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron SU2300 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 169,000,000 410,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclock popularity 8 2
Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 1.44 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 1.2 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 1.44 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 800 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction
Intel Celeron SU2300
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus