Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 3.2x higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.5 MB 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz vs 1.08 GHz More than 3.5x better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 0.9 GHz More than 4.8x better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Newer Oct, 2005 vs Jul, 2004 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron M 353

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron M 353

Report a correction
Much lower typical power consumption 4.06W vs 68.25W 16.8x lower typical power consumption
Much lower annual home energy cost 1.2 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 16.8x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 4.38 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 16.8x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 630  vs Celeron M 353 

clock speed

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 630
3.83 GHz
Celeron M 353
1.08 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 630
4.33 GHz
Celeron M 353
0.9 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron M 353 
Clock speed 3 GHz 0.9 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
479

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 84W 5W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 1.2 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 4.38 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 4.06W

details

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron M 353 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 169,000,000 144,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 9

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 1.08 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 0.9 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 1.08 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 400 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction
Intel Celeron M 353
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus