0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron D 335 |
Released October, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 630
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 630
![]() | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | More threads 2 | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
VS
Released June, 2004
Intel Celeron D 335
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Celeron D 335
![]() | Lower typical power consumption 59.31W | ![]() | Lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year |
![]() | Lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.25 MB | 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.25 MB/core | 8x more l2 cache per core | |||
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 3.69 GHz | Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | Oct, 2005 | vs | Jun, 2004 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
Lower typical power consumption | 59.31W | vs | 68.25W | Around 15% lower typical power consumption | |||
Lower annual home energy cost | 17.59 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | Around 15% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Lower annual commercial energy cost | 63.95 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron D 335
clock speed
Pentium 4 630
3 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 630
2 MB
Celeron D 335
0.25 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 630
3.83 GHz
Celeron D 335
3.69 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 630
4.33 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 630
84W
Celeron D 335
73W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 630 | vs | Celeron D 335 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
478 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | No | |
Supports trusted computing | No | No | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | No | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 73W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 17.59 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 63.95 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 59.31W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 630 | vs | Celeron D 335 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.25 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.25 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
Transistor count | 169,000,000 | 125,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 15 | 21 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 1.25 - 1.4V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 66.6°C | Unknown - 67°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.83 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 786.9 | 523.2 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | 3.69 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 630 ![]() | Intel Celeron D 335 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Core2 Duo E6300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $179 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Core2 Duo E8400 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $163 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs D 945 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | ||
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs AMD Athlon 64 3200+ | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $54 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron D 355 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $125 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Core2 Duo E7500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$69 | $32 | |
Intel Pentium 4 630 vs Atom N270 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
Intel Xeon W3520 vs Core i5 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
Intel Core i7 4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 4200U vs AMD A8 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
Intel Core i5 6200U vs AMD A9 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
Intel Core i3 4005U vs Pentium N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | $225 | |
Intel Celeron 847 vs Core i3 3217U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
Intel Core i5 3470 vs AMD A6 5200 | ||