Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Intel Pentium 4 630

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630
Front view of Intel Celeron D 335

Intel Celeron D 335

Join the discussion

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 2 MB vs 0.25 MB 8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More threads 2 vs 1 Twice as many threads
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 8x more l2 cache per core
Higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.8 GHz More than 5% higher clock speed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz vs 2.8 GHz Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz vs 3.69 GHz Around 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Newer Oct, 2005 vs Jun, 2004 Release date over 1 years later
Front view of Intel Celeron D 335

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron D 335

Report a correction
Lower typical power consumption 59.31W vs 68.25W Around 15% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 17.59 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 15% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 63.95 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 15% lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 630  vs Celeron D 335 

clock speed

Pentium 4 630
3 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz

L2 cache

Pentium 4 630
2 MB
Celeron D 335
0.25 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 630
3.83 GHz
Celeron D 335
3.69 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 630
4.33 GHz
Celeron D 335
2.8 GHz

TDP

Pentium 4 630
84W
Celeron D 335
73W

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

 Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron D 335 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.8 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features
Has a NX bit Yes No
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
MMX
SSE
SSE2
SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption
TDP 84W 73W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 17.59 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 63.95 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 59.31W

bus
Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

 Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron D 335 
Architecture x86-64 x86
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 0.25 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Transistor count 169,000,000 125,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 21
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.4V 1.25 - 1.4V
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.6°C Unknown - 67°C

overclocking
Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 3.69 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 2.8 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 786.9 523.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 3.69 GHz

integrated graphics
GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction
Intel Celeron D 335
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus

features

information

  • terms and privacy
  • about
  • blog

on the web

CPUBoss