Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2.13 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core vs 1 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 68.25W 2.7x lower typical power consumption
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 66.6 °C More than 50% higher Maximum operating temperature
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Oct, 2005 Release date over 2 years later
Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 2.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 630 vs Celeron 560

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron 560 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes No

power consumption

TDP 84W 31W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 27.16 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 25.19W

details

Pentium 4 630  vs
Celeron 560 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 169,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 16
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.4V 0.95 - 1.3V
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.6°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus