Intel Pentium 4 630 vs AMD Sempron 2800+ |
Released October, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 630
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 630
 | Much more l2 cache 2 MB | | Much higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
VS
Released July, 2004
AMD Sempron 2800+
- 1.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 2800+
| | Significantly lower typical power consumption 50.38W | | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 70 °C |
| | Significantly lower annual home energy cost 14.94 $/year | | Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 54.31 $/year |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 0.5 MB | 4x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 1.6 GHz | More than 85% higher clock speed | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | vs | 2.36 GHz | More than 60% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | vs | 1.8 GHz | Around 2.5x better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| Newer | Oct, 2005 | vs | Jul, 2004 | Release date over 1 years later | |||
| |||||||
| Significantly lower typical power consumption | 50.38W | vs | 68.25W | More than 25% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 70 °C | vs | 66.6 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Significantly lower annual home energy cost | 14.94 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | More than 25% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost | 54.31 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | More than 25% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 630 vs Sempron 2800+
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 630 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 1.6 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| 754 | |||
| AM2 | |||
| 462 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | No | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 62W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 14.94 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 54.31 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 50.38W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 200 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 630 | vs | Sempron 2800+ |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 0.5 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 90 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 66.6°C | Unknown - 70°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclock popularity | 8 | 1 | |
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.83 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.33 GHz | 1.8 GHz | |
| PassMark (Overclocked) | 786.9 | 543.6 | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.83 GHz | 2.36 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 630  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 2800+ Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 630 vs E6300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | $179 | |
| 630 vs E8400 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | $163 | |
| 630 vs 945 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | ||
| 630 vs 3200+ | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | $54 | |
| 630 vs 355 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | $74 | |
| 630 vs 820 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $69 | $67 | |
| 630 vs E2140 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $67 | $74 | |
| E2140 vs 925 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
