Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 630

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 630

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Intel Pentium 4 630 vs the AMD Athlon 64 3200+.

Front view of AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Reasons to consider the
AMD Athlon 64 3200+

Report a correction
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 630 vs Athlon 64 3200+

GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench

x264 HD 4.0

Pentium 4 630
9.51 fps
Athlon 64 3200+
8.98 fps

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 630  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
754
AM2

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes Yes

details

Pentium 4 630  vs
Athlon 64 3200+ 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 2 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 2 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 130 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Operating temperature Unknown - 66.6°C Unknown - 70°C

overclocking

Overclock popularity 8 3
Overclocked clock speed 3.83 GHz 2.68 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.33 GHz 2.87 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 786.9 942.2
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.83 GHz 2.68 GHz

power consumption

TDP 84W 89W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 21.44 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 77.96 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 72.31W
Intel Pentium 4 630
Report a correction
AMD Athlon 64 3200+
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus