0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 620 vs Core i3 380M |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Pentium 4 620
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 620
![]() | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2010
Intel Core i3 380M
- 2.53 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i3 380M
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.53 GHz | More than 10% higher clock speed | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.59 GHz | Around 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2.53 GHz | More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 68.25W | 2.4x lower typical power consumption | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 2.4x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 2.4x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 620 vs Core i3 380M
clock speed
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Core i3 380M
2.53 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 620
2 MB
Core i3 380M
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 620
3.33 GHz
Core i3 380M
2.59 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Core i3 380M
2.53 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 620
84W
Core i3 380M
35W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Core i3 380M |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
BGA 1288 | |||
rPGA 988A | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 35W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 28.44W |
details | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Core i3 380M |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
Transistor count | 169,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 19 | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 2.53 GHz | |
PassMark (Overclocked) | 844.4 | 1,108.4 | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | 2.59 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 667 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium 4 620 ![]() | Intel Core i3 380M ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$75 | $225 | |
1005M vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$346 | $225 | |
640M vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$65 | $225 | |
480M vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | $225 | |
520M vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$60 | $225 | |
560M vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$522 | $225 | |
P6200 vs 380M | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$21 | $225 | |
370M vs 380M | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $250 | |
6700K vs 6600K | ||