0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 620 vs Core Duo T2350 |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Pentium 4 620
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 620
![]() | Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz |
VS
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Core Duo T2350
- 1.86 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core Duo T2350
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W | ![]() | More cores 2 |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Significantly higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | More than 50% higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 1 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 2.52 GHz | Around 35% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.86 GHz | More than 50% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 65 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 25.19W | vs | 68.25W | 2.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 7.47 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 2.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 27.16 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 2.7x lower annual commercial energy cost |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 620 vs Core Duo T2350
clock speed
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Core Duo T2350
1.86 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 620
2 MB
Core Duo T2350
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 620
3.33 GHz
Core Duo T2350
2.52 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Core Duo T2350
1.86 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 620
84W
Core Duo T2350
31W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Core Duo T2350 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
478 | |||
M | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | No | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
MMX | |||
SSE | |||
SSE2 | |||
SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 31W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 7.47 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 27.16 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 25.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 533 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Core Duo T2350 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86 | |
Threads | 2 | 2 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 65 nm | |
Transistor count | 169,000,000 | 151,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 14 | 14 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 0.95 - 1.26V | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 2.52 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 1.86 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | 2.52 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 620 ![]() | Intel Core Duo T2350 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
Z3735F vs 620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
3000+ vs 620 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T7600 vs T2350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T2250 vs T2350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$177 | ||
T5500 vs T2350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
T7200 vs T2350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$134 | ||
T4400 vs T2350 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | ||
7th Gen A12-9700P vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||