0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 620 vs Atom Z3735F |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Pentium 4 620
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 620
![]() | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | ![]() | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
![]() | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz | ![]() | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom Z3735F
- 1.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3735F
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | ![]() | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 1.79W | ![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 1.63 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.83 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 1.79W | vs | 68.25W | 38.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.53 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 38.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 1.93 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 38.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 620 vs Atom Z3735F
clock speed
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Atom Z3735F
1.33 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 620
2 MB
Atom Z3735F
2 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 620
3.33 GHz
Atom Z3735F
1.63 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 620
2.8 GHz
Atom Z3735F
1.83 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 620
84W
Atom Z3735F
2.2W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
BGA 592 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE4 | |||
SSE3 | |||
EM64T | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
SSE4.2 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
AES | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 2.2W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 1.79W |
details | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 22 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 0.4 - 1.14V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | GPU | |
Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | 311 MHz | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | 646 MHz | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 |
Intel Pentium 4 620 ![]() | Intel Atom Z3735F ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $21 | |
Z3735F vs x5-Z8300 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Z3735F vs N2840 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $107 | |
Z3735F vs N3050 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $32 | |
Z3735F vs Z3740 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | ||
Z3735F vs x5-Z8350 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $17 | |
Z3735F vs Z3735G | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$17 | $20 | |
Z3735F vs Z3736F | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$305 | $300 | |
W3520 vs 2500 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$272 | $350 | |
4790K vs 6700K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
4200U vs 6410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$275 | $161 | |
4005U vs N3540 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$248 | $230 | |
4770K vs 9590 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$250 | $350 | |
6600K vs 6700K | ||