Intel Pentium 4 620 vs Atom Z3735F |
First seen on June, 2012
Intel Pentium 4 620
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 620
 | Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 2 MB/core |
| | Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.33 GHz | | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 2.8 GHz |
VS
Released April, 2014
Intel Atom Z3735F
- 1.33 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Atom Z3735F
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Much lower typical power consumption 1.79W | | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Much higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.33 GHz | More than 2x higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 4x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | vs | 1.63 GHz | More than 2x better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.83 GHz | Around 55% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 1.79W | vs | 68.25W | 38.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 0.53 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 38.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 1.93 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 38.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 620 vs Atom Z3735F
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.33 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| BGA 592 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| EM64T | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 2.2W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 0.53 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 1.93 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 1.79W | |
details | Pentium 4 620 | vs | Atom Z3735F |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86-64 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 2 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 2 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.4V | 0.4 - 1.14V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.33 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 2.8 GHz | 1.83 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.33 GHz | 1.63 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 311 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 646 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Pentium 4 620  Report a correction |  Intel Atom Z3735F Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $17 | $21 | |
| Z3735F vs x5-Z8300 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | $107 | |
| Z3735F vs N2840 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | $107 | |
| Z3735F vs N3050 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | $32 | |
| Z3735F vs Z3740 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | ||
| Z3735F vs x5-Z8350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | $17 | |
| Z3735F vs Z3735G | ||
| | VS |  |
| $17 | $27 | |
| Z3735F vs x5-Z8500 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $134 | $225 | |
| 847 vs 3217U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
