0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 570 vs Core2 Quad Q9650 |
VS
Released August, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q9650
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Supports trusted computing Yes |
![]() | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 4 570 vs the Core2 Quad Q9650. | |||||||
| |||||||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 570 vs Core2 Quad Q9650
clock speed
Pentium 4 570
3.8 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9650
3 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 570
1 MB
Core2 Quad Q9650
12 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 570
4.24 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9650
4.15 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 570
3.8 GHz
Core2 Quad Q9650
4.25 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 570
115W
Core2 Quad Q9650
95W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 570 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9650 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
SSE4.1 | |||
Supplemental SSE3 | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 115W | 95W | |
Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 570 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9650 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 4 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Transistor count | 125,000,000 | 820,000,000 | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Clock multiplier | 19 | 9 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.43V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.8°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 4.24 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.8 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.24 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 570 ![]() | Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$969 | $339 | |
E5450 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$287 | $339 | |
Q9550 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | ||
Q6600 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $339 | |
E8400 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $339 | |
3220 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$339 | ||
QX9650 vs Q9650 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$1,245 | $339 | |
X5460 vs Q9650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$230 | $248 | |
9590 vs 4770K | ||