Intel Pentium 4 570 vs Core2 Quad Q9650 |
VS
Released August, 2008
Intel Core2 Quad Q9650
- 3 GHz
- Quad core
- Unlocked
Reasons to buy the Core2 Quad Q9650
 | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Supports trusted computing Yes |
| | Has virtualization support Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the Pentium 4 570 vs the Core2 Quad Q9650. | |||||||
| |||||||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 570 vs Core2 Quad Q9650
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 570 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.8 GHz | 3 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 95W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 22.89 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 83.22 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 77.19W | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 1,333 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 570 | vs | Core2 Quad Q9650 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 12 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 3 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Transistor count | 125,000,000 | 820,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 19 | 9 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.43V | 0.85 - 1.36V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 72.8°C | Unknown - 71.4°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.24 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.8 GHz | 4.25 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.24 GHz | 4.15 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 570  Report a correction |  Intel Core2 Quad Q9650 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $969 | $339 | |
| E5450 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $287 | $339 | |
| Q9550 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $339 | ||
| Q6600 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $339 | |
| E8400 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $339 | ||
| QX9650 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $125 | $339 | |
| 3220 vs Q9650 | ||
 | VS | |
| $1,245 | $339 | |
| X5460 vs Q9650 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS | |
| $50 | $125 | |
| 5300 vs 3220 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
