Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 560

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.93 GHz Around 25% higher clock speed
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 3.85 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Front view of Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core2 Duo E7500

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 3 MB vs 1 MB 3x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Much better performance per watt 1.9 pt/W vs 0.91 pt/W More than 2x better performance per watt
Much lower typical power consumption 52.81W vs 93.44W Around 45% lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much lower annual home energy cost 15.66 $/year vs 27.7 $/year Around 45% lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 56.94 $/year vs 100.74 $/year Around 45% lower annual commercial energy cost
Higher Maximum operating temperature 74.1 °C vs 72.8 °C Almost the same
Newer Jan, 2009 vs Jul, 2005 Release date over 3 years later
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.06 GHz vs 3.6 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 560 vs Core2 Duo E7500

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium 4 560
126,700 MB/s
Core2 Duo E7500
124,700 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 560  vs
Core2 Duo E7500 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 2.93 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 115W 65W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 15.66 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 56.94 $/year
Performance per watt 0.91 pt/W 1.9 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 52.81W

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 1,066 MHz

details

Pentium 4 560  vs
Core2 Duo E7500 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 3 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 45 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 228,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 11
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.43V 0.85 - 1.36V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.8°C Unknown - 74.1°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.05 GHz 3.85 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 4.06 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz 3.85 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A
Intel Pentium 4 560
Report a correction
Intel Core2 Duo E7500
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus