Intel Pentium 4 560 vs Core i5 560M |
Released July, 2005
Intel Pentium 4 560
- 3.6 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 560
 | Significantly higher clock speed 3.6 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
| | Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz | | Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz |
VS
Released September, 2010
Intel Core i5 560M
- 2.66 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the Core i5 560M
| | Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Has a built-in GPU Yes | | Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.66 GHz | More than 35% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 3.1 GHz | More than 30% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | vs | 2.13 GHz | Around 70% better overclocked clock speed (Water) | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 32 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 28.44W | vs | 93.44W | 3.3x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much better performance per watt | 16.48 pt/W | vs | 0.91 pt/W | Around 18.2x better performance per watt | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | 4,086 | vs | 1,083 | More than 3.8x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score | |||
| Significantly better geekbench 3 single core score | 1,961 | vs | 936 | More than 2x better geekbench 3 single core score | |||
| Supports trusted computing | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for safer, more reliable computing | |||
| Newer | Sep, 2010 | vs | Jul, 2005 | Release date over 5 years later | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 8.43 $/year | vs | 27.7 $/year | 3.3x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 30.66 $/year | vs | 100.74 $/year | 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 2 | Twice as many threads | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 560 vs Core i5 560M
GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 560 | vs | Core i5 560M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3.6 GHz | 2.66 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| BGA 1288 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Supports trusted computing | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE4 | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| SSE4.1 | |||
| SSE4.2 | |||
| Supplemental SSE3 | |||
| AES | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 115W | 35W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 27.7 $/year | 8.43 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 100.74 $/year | 30.66 $/year | |
| Performance per watt | 0.91 pt/W | 16.48 pt/W | |
| Typical power consumption | 93.44W | 28.44W | |
details | Pentium 4 560 | vs | Core i5 560M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 32 nm | |
| Transistor count | 125,000,000 | 382,000,000 | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Clock multiplier | 18 | 20 | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 4.05 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 3.6 GHz | 2.13 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | 3.1 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 500 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 766 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | DMI | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Pentium 4 560  Report a correction |  Intel Core i5 560M Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $60 | $225 | |
| 560M vs 380M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $346 | |
| 560M vs 640M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $250 | |
| 560M vs 2520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $259 | |
| 560M vs 620M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $30 | |
| 560M vs 520M | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $522 | |
| 560M vs P6200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $60 | $80 | |
| 560M vs 580M | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $275 | $161 | |
| 4005U vs N3540 | ||
 | VS | |
| $250 | $350 | |
| 6600K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $248 | $230 | |
| 4770K vs 9590 | ||
