CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of 560 vs 380M among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

7.3

CPUBoss Score

Combination of all six facets

Winner
Intel Core i3 380M 

CPUBoss recommends the Intel Core i3 380M  based on its power consumption.

See full details

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 560

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.53 GHz More than 40% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz vs 2.59 GHz More than 55% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz vs 2.53 GHz More than 40% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Core i3 380M

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 380M

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 32 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 28.44W vs 93.44W 3.3x lower typical power consumption
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score 3,269 vs 1,083 More than 3x better geekbench 3 Multi-Core score
Newer Sep, 2010 vs Jul, 2005 Release date over 5 years later
Better geekbench 3 single core score 1,505 vs 936 More than 60% better geekbench 3 single core score
Better performance per watt 2.98 pt/W vs 0.91 pt/W More than 3.2x better performance per watt
Much lower annual home energy cost 8.43 $/year vs 27.7 $/year 3.3x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 30.66 $/year vs 100.74 $/year 3.3x lower annual commercial energy cost
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 560 vs Core i3 380M

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium 4 560
126,700 MB/s
Core i3 380M
106,200 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 560  vs
Core i3 380M 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 2.53 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
BGA 1288
rPGA 988A

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 115W 35W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 8.43 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 30.66 $/year
Performance per watt 0.91 pt/W 2.98 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 28.44W

details

Pentium 4 560  vs
Core i3 380M 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 32 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 382,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 19

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 4.05 GHz 2.59 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.6 GHz 2.53 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 777.1 1,108.4
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 4.05 GHz 2.59 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 500 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 667 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium 4 560
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 380M
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus