CPUBoss Review Our evaluation of Pentium 4 560 vs Celeron 560 among all CPUs

Performance

Benchmark performance using all cores

PCMark 8 Home 3.0 Accelerated, PassMark and 1 more

Single-core Performance

Individual core benchmark performance

PassMark (Single Core), Geekbench 3 Single Core and 1 more

Integrated Graphics

Integrated GPU performance for graphics

Sky Diver and Cloud Gate

Integrated Graphics (OpenCL)

Integrated GPU performance for parallel computing

CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 4 more

Performance per Watt

How efficiently does the processor use electricity?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

Value

Are you paying a premium for performance?

Sky Diver, Cloud Gate, CompuBench 1.5 Bitcoin mining and 11 more

No winner declared

Too close to call

Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 560

Report a correction
Much better geekbench 3 AES single core score 126,700 MB/s vs 85,000 MB/s Around 50% better geekbench 3 AES single core score
Much higher clock speed 3.6 GHz vs 2.13 GHz Around 70% higher clock speed
Front view of Intel Celeron 560

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron 560

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 65 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Much lower typical power consumption 25.19W vs 93.44W 3.7x lower typical power consumption
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much higher Maximum operating temperature 100 °C vs 72.8 °C More than 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
Much lower annual home energy cost 7.47 $/year vs 27.7 $/year 3.7x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 27.16 $/year vs 100.74 $/year 3.7x lower annual commercial energy cost
Newer Jan, 2008 vs Jul, 2005 Release date over 2 years later
Better performance per watt 2.2 pt/W vs 0.91 pt/W Around 2.5x better performance per watt

Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 560 vs Celeron 560

GeekBench 3 (Multi-core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (Single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

GeekBench 3 (AES single core) Data courtesy Primate Labs

Pentium 4 560
126,700 MB/s
Celeron 560
85,000 MB/s

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 560  vs
Celeron 560 
Clock speed 3.6 GHz 2.13 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
478

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Supports trusted computing No No
Has virtualization support No No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No No

power consumption

TDP 115W 31W
Annual home energy cost 27.7 $/year 7.47 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 100.74 $/year 27.16 $/year
Performance per watt 0.91 pt/W 2.2 pt/W
Typical power consumption 93.44W 25.19W

details

Pentium 4 560  vs
Celeron 560 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 65 nm
Transistor count 125,000,000 291,000,000
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 18 16
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.43V 0.95 - 1.3V
Operating temperature Unknown - 72.8°C Unknown - 100°C

integrated graphics

GPU None None
Label N/A N/A
Latest DirectX N/A N/A
Number of displays supported N/A N/A
GPU clock speed N/A N/A
Turbo clock speed N/A N/A
3DMark06 N/A N/A

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 560
Report a correction
Intel Celeron 560
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus