Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 530J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 530J

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 2 GHz 50% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Front view of Intel Celeron J1900

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron J1900

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
More advanced architecture x86-64 vs x86 A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Much lower typical power consumption 8.13W vs 68.25W 8.4x lower typical power consumption
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Oct, 2013 vs Oct, 2004 Release date over 9 years later
More cores 4 vs 1 3 more cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual home energy cost 2.41 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 8.4x lower annual home energy cost
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 8.76 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 8.4x lower annual commercial energy cost
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 530J  vs Celeron J1900 

clock speed

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 530J  vs
Celeron J1900 
Clock speed 3 GHz 2 GHz
Cores Single core Quad core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 10W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 2.41 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 8.76 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 8.13W

details

Pentium 4 530J  vs
Celeron J1900 
Architecture x86 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 2
GPU clock speed N/A 688 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 854 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium 4 530J
Report a correction
Intel Celeron J1900
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus