0 Comments
| Intel Pentium 4 530 vs AMD Sempron 145 |
Released February, 2004
Intel Pentium 4 530
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 530
![]() | More threads 2 | ![]() | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
![]() | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
![]() | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | ![]() | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
![]() | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | ![]() | Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.7 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 68.25W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 3.75 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Feb, 2004 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | vs | 4.18 GHz | Almost the same |
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 530 vs Sempron 145
clock speed
Pentium 4 530
3 GHz
Sempron 145
2.8 GHz
L2 cache
Pentium 4 530
1 MB
Sempron 145
1 MB
overclocked clock speed (air)
Pentium 4 530
3.75 GHz
Sempron 145
4.05 GHz
overclocked clock speed (water)
Pentium 4 530
4.18 GHz
Sempron 145
4.28 GHz
TDP
Pentium 4 530
84W
Sempron 145
45W
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 530 | vs | Sempron 145 |
---|---|---|---|
Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
Cores | Single core | Single core | |
Socket type | |||
LGA 775 | |||
AM3 | |||
features | |||
Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
Instruction set extensions | |||
SSE4a | |||
SSE2 | |||
MMX | |||
SSE3 | |||
SSE | |||
3DNow! | |||
Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
TDP | 84W | 45W | |
Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz |
details | Pentium 4 530 | vs | Sempron 145 |
---|---|---|---|
Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
Threads | 2 | 1 | |
L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.43V | 0.82 - 1.35V | |
Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
Overclocked clock speed | 3.75 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.18 GHz | 4.28 GHz | |
Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.75 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
GPU | None | None | |
Label | N/A | N/A | |
Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
3DMark06 | N/A | N/A |
Intel Pentium 4 530 ![]() | AMD Sempron 145 ![]() |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$125 | $30 | |
3220 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
270 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
250 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$179 | $30 | |
E8400 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$200 | $30 | |
965 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$30 | ||
140 vs 145 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$42 | $30 | |
G1610 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$300 | $305 | |
2500 vs W3520 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$350 | $272 | |
6700K vs 4790K | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
6410 vs 4200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$225 | $134 | |
3217U vs 847 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$281 | ||
7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$180 | ||
5200 vs 3470 | ||
![]() | VS | ![]() |
$161 | $275 | |
N3540 vs 4005U | ||