Intel Pentium 4 530 vs AMD Sempron 145 |
Released February, 2004
Intel Pentium 4 530
- 3 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 530
 | More threads 2 | | Higher clock speed 3 GHz |
| | Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C |
VS
Released May, 2010
AMD Sempron 145
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the AMD Sempron 145
| | Much newer manufacturing process 45 nm | | More advanced architecture x86-64 |
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Much lower typical power consumption 36.56W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| More threads | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many threads | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Higher clock speed | 3 GHz | vs | 2.8 GHz | More than 5% higher clock speed | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 67.7 °C | vs | 63 °C | More than 5% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 45 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 36.56W | vs | 68.25W | More than 45% lower typical power consumption | |||
| Has a NX bit | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) | 4.05 GHz | vs | 3.75 GHz | Around 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air) | |||
| Newer | May, 2010 | vs | Feb, 2004 | Release date over 6 years later | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 39.42 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | More than 45% lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 10.84 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | More than 45% lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Better overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.28 GHz | vs | 4.18 GHz | Almost the same | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 530 vs Sempron 145
clock speed
L2 cache
overclocked clock speed (air)
overclocked clock speed (water)
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 530 | vs | Sempron 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 3 GHz | 2.8 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Single core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| AM3 | |||
features | |||
| Has a NX bit | No | Yes | |
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Instruction set extensions | |||
| SSE4a | |||
| SSE2 | |||
| MMX | |||
| SSE3 | |||
| SSE | |||
| 3DNow! | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 45W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 10.84 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 39.42 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 36.56W | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 2,000 MHz | |
details | Pentium 4 530 | vs | Sempron 145 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 2 | 1 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 1 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 45 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Voltage range | 1.2 - 1.43V | 0.82 - 1.35V | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 63°C | |
overclocking | |||
| Overclocked clock speed | 3.75 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Water) | 4.18 GHz | 4.28 GHz | |
| Overclocked clock speed (Air) | 3.75 GHz | 4.05 GHz | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | None | |
| Label | N/A | N/A | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | N/A | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | N/A | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | N/A | |
| 3DMark06 | N/A | N/A | |
 Intel Pentium 4 530  Report a correction |  AMD Sempron 145 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $30 | |
| 3220 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| 270 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| 250 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $179 | $30 | |
| E8400 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $200 | $30 | |
| 965 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $30 | ||
| 140 vs 145 | ||
 | VS | |
| $42 | $30 | |
| G1610 vs 145 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $134 | |
| 3217U vs 847 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 5200 vs 3470 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
