Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 530

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 530

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 85% higher clock speed
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.5 MB/core 2x more l2 cache per core
Better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz vs 3.5 GHz More than 5% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Better overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.18 GHz vs 3.5 GHz Around 20% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of AMD E 350

Reasons to consider the
AMD E 350

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Much lower typical power consumption 30.2W vs 68.25W 2.3x lower typical power consumption
Newer Jan, 2011 vs Feb, 2004 Release date over 7 years later
Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature 90 °C vs 67.7 °C Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Much lower annual commercial energy cost 28.21 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 2.6x lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 12 $/year vs 20.24 $/year More than 40% lower annual home energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 530  vs E 350 

clock speed

E 350
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

E 350
1 MB

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 530
3.75 GHz
E 350
3.5 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 530
4.18 GHz
E 350
3.5 GHz

TDP

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 530  vs
E 350 
Clock speed 3 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit No Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE4a
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AMD64
AMD-V
Supplemental SSE3
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 18W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 12 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 28.21 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 30.2W

details

Pentium 4 530  vs
E 350 
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 1 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.5 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 40 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 15 8
Voltage range 1.2 - 1.43V 1.25 - 1.35V
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 90°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.75 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 4.18 GHz 3.5 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.75 GHz 3.5 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Radeon™ HD 6310
Latest DirectX N/A 11.0
GPU clock speed N/A 492 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 530
Report a correction
AMD E 350
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus