Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 524

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 524

Report a correction
Much more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.5 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.25 MB/core 4x more l2 cache per core
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.81 GHz vs 3.43 GHz More than 10% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Higher Maximum operating temperature 67.7 °C vs 65.3 °C Around 5% higher Maximum operating temperature
Front view of Intel Core i3 3220

Reasons to consider the
Intel Core i3 3220

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
More threads 4 vs 2 Twice as many threads
Higher clock speed 3.3 GHz vs 3.06 GHz Around 10% higher clock speed
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Significantly lower typical power consumption 44.69W vs 68.25W Around 35% lower typical power consumption
Newer Sep, 2012 vs Apr, 2006 Release date over 6 years later
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 13.25 $/year vs 20.24 $/year Around 35% lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 48.18 $/year vs 73.58 $/year Around 35% lower annual commercial energy cost
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.46 GHz vs 3.07 GHz Around 15% better overclocked clock speed (Water)

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 524  vs Core i3 3220 

clock speed

Pentium 4 524
3.06 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.3 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 524
3.81 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.43 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 524
3.07 GHz
Core i3 3220
3.46 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 524  vs
Core i3 3220 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 3.3 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core
Socket type
LGA 775
LGA 1155

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE4
AVX
SSE3
SSE
SSE4.1
SSE4.2
Supplemental SSE3
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 55W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 13.25 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 48.18 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 44.69W

details

Pentium 4 524  vs
Core i3 3220 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 4
L2 cache 1 MB 0.5 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.25 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 22 nm
Max CPUs 1 1
Clock multiplier 23 33
Operating temperature Unknown - 67.7°C Unknown - 65.3°C

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.81 GHz 3.43 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz 3.46 GHz
PassMark (Overclocked) 492.9 3,775.1
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.81 GHz 3.43 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics 2500
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 650 MHz
Turbo clock speed N/A 1,050 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB DMI
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium 4 524
Report a correction
Intel Core i3 3220
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus