Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 524

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 524

Report a correction
Much higher clock speed 3.06 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 90% higher clock speed
Much better overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.81 GHz vs 2.14 GHz Around 80% better overclocked clock speed (Air)
Significantly better overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz vs 1.6 GHz More than 90% better overclocked clock speed (Water)
Front view of Intel Celeron N3050

Reasons to consider the
Intel Celeron N3050

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 14 nm vs 90 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes vs No Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed
Has a built-in GPU Yes vs No Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
Newer Jan, 2015 vs Apr, 2006 Release date over 8 years later
Significantly lower typical power consumption 4.88W vs 68.25W 14x lower typical power consumption
Significantly lower annual home energy cost 1.45 $/year vs 20.24 $/year 14x lower annual home energy cost
Significantly lower annual commercial energy cost 5.26 $/year vs 73.58 $/year 14x lower annual commercial energy cost

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 524  vs Celeron N3050 

clock speed

Pentium 4 524
3.06 GHz
Celeron N3050
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

overclocked clock speed (air)

Pentium 4 524
3.81 GHz
Celeron N3050
2.14 GHz

overclocked clock speed (water)

Pentium 4 524
3.07 GHz
Celeron N3050
1.6 GHz

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 524  vs
Celeron N3050 
Clock speed 3.06 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has a NX bit Yes Yes
Has virtualization support No Yes
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
AES
Supports dynamic frequency scaling No Yes

power consumption

TDP 84W 6W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 1.45 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 5.26 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 4.88W

details

Pentium 4 524  vs
Celeron N3050 
Architecture x86-64 x86-64
Threads 2 2
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 14 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

overclocking

Overclocked clock speed 3.81 GHz 2.14 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Water) 3.07 GHz 1.6 GHz
Overclocked clock speed (Air) 3.81 GHz 2.14 GHz

integrated graphics

GPU None GPU
Label N/A Intel® HD Graphics
Number of displays supported N/A 3
GPU clock speed N/A 320 MHz

bus

Architecture FSB FSB
Number of links 1 1
Intel Pentium 4 524
Report a correction
Intel Celeron N3050
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus