Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 520J

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 520J

Report a correction
Much newer manufacturing process 90 nm vs 180 nm A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor
Much higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 0.5 GHz More than 5.5x higher clock speed
Significantly more l2 cache 1 MB vs 0.13 MB Around 7.8x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Has a NX bit Yes vs No Somewhat common; Prevents a common class of security exploits
Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core vs 0.13 MB/core Around 7.8x more l2 cache per core
Newer Apr, 2004 vs Jun, 1999 Release date over 4 years later
Front view of AMD K6-2+ 500

Reasons to consider the
AMD K6-2+ 500

Report a correction

CPUBoss is not aware of any important advantages of the AMD K6-2+ 500 vs the Intel Pentium 4 520J.

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 520J  vs K6-2+ 500 

clock speed

Pentium 4 520J
2.8 GHz
K6-2+ 500
0.5 GHz

L2 cache

K6-2+ 500
0.13 MB

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 520J  vs
K6-2+ 500 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 0.5 GHz
Cores Single core Single core
Socket type
LGA 775
Slot A
Super 7

features

Has a NX bit Yes No
Instruction set extensions
SSE2
MMX
SSE3
SSE
3DNow!

details

Pentium 4 520J  vs
K6-2+ 500 
Threads 2 1
L2 cache 1 MB 0.13 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 0.13 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 180 nm
Max CPUs 1 1

power consumption

Typical power consumption 68.25W N/A

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 100 MHz
Intel Pentium 4 520J
Report a correction
AMD K6-2+ 500
Report a correction

Comments

comments powered by Disqus