Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?

Thanks for adding your opinion. Follow us on Facebook to stay up to date with the latest news!
VS

Differences What are the advantages of each

Front view of Intel Pentium 4 520

Reasons to consider the
Intel Pentium 4 520

Report a correction
Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz vs 1.6 GHz Around 75% higher clock speed
Lower typical power consumption 68.25W vs 84.5W Around 20% lower typical power consumption
Lower annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year vs 25.05 $/year Around 20% lower annual home energy cost
Lower annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year vs 91.1 $/year Around 20% lower annual commercial energy cost
Front view of Intel Itanium 2 9052

Reasons to consider the
Intel Itanium 2 9052

Report a correction
Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB vs 1 MB 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later
Supports more CPUs in SMP configuration 4 vs 1 3 supports more CPUs in SMP configuration
Has virtualization support Yes vs No Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines
More threads 4 vs 1 3 more threads
More cores 2 vs 1 Twice as many cores; run more applications at once

Features Key features of the Pentium 4 520  vs Itanium 2 9052 

clock speed

Pentium 4 520
2.8 GHz
Itanium 2 9052
1.6 GHz

L2 cache

Specifications Full list of technical specs

summary

Pentium 4 520  vs
Itanium 2 9052 
Clock speed 2.8 GHz 1.6 GHz
Cores Single core Dual core

features

Has virtualization support No Yes

bus

Clock speed 800 MHz 533 MHz

details

Pentium 4 520  vs
Itanium 2 9052 
Threads 1 4
L2 cache 1 MB 2 MB
L2 cache per core 1 MB/core 1 MB/core
Manufacture process 90 nm 90 nm
Max CPUs 1 4

power consumption

TDP 84W 104W
Annual home energy cost 20.24 $/year 25.05 $/year
Annual commercial energy cost 73.58 $/year 91.1 $/year
Typical power consumption 68.25W 84.5W
Intel Pentium 4 520
Report a correction
Intel Itanium 2 9052
Report a correction

Read more

Comments

comments powered by Disqus