Intel Pentium 4 520 vs Celeron N2920 |
Released November, 2000
Intel Pentium 4 520
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 520
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released November, 2013
Intel Celeron N2920
- 2 GHz
- Quad core
Reasons to buy the Celeron N2920
| | Much newer manufacturing process 22 nm | | Significantly more l2 cache 2 MB |
| | More advanced architecture x86-64 | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 2 GHz | Around 40% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 22 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Significantly more l2 cache | 2 MB | vs | 1 MB | 2x more l2 cache; more data can be stored in the l2 cache for quick access later | |||
| More advanced architecture | x86-64 | vs | x86 | A 64-bit architecture allows more RAM to be installed and accessed by the processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 6.09W | vs | 68.25W | 11.2x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer | Nov, 2013 | vs | Nov, 2000 | Release date over 13 years later | |||
| More cores | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more cores; run more applications at once | |||
| More threads | 4 | vs | 1 | 3 more threads | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 1.81 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 11.2x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 6.57 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 11.2x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
Report a correction
Features Key features of the Pentium 4 520 vs Celeron N2920
clock speed
L2 cache
TDP
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 520 | vs | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 2 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Quad core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| BGA 1170 | |||
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 7.5W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 1.81 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 6.57 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 6.09W | |
details | Pentium 4 520 | vs | Celeron N2920 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Architecture | x86 | x86-64 | |
| Threads | 1 | 4 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 2 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 22 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Intel® HD Graphics | |
| Number of displays supported | N/A | 2 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 756 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 844 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Architecture | FSB | FSB | |
| Number of links | 1 | 1 | |
 Intel Pentium 4 520  Report a correction |  Intel Celeron N2920 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | $132 | |
| 3217U vs N2920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $225 | $132 | |
| 3230M vs N2920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $107 | $132 | |
| N2840 vs N2920 | ||
 | VS | |
| $161 | $132 | |
| N3520 vs N2920 | ||
 | VS |  |
| 3200+ vs 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| 3000+ vs 520 | ||
 | VS | |
| 2200+ vs 520 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $300 | $305 | |
| 2500 vs W3520 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $350 | $272 | |
| 6700K vs 4790K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6410 vs 4200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 7th Gen A9-9410 vs 6200U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $161 | $275 | |
| N3540 vs 4005U | ||
 | VS |  |
| $230 | $248 | |
| 9590 vs 4770K | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | $250 | |
| 6700K vs 6600K | ||
