Intel Pentium 4 520 vs AMD E 450 |
Released November, 2000
Intel Pentium 4 520
- 2.8 GHz
- Single core
Reasons to buy the Intel Pentium 4 520
 | Significantly higher clock speed 2.8 GHz | | Much more l2 cache per core 1 MB/core |
VS
Released August, 2011
AMD E 450
- 1.65 GHz
- Dual core
Reasons to buy the AMD E 450
| | Much newer manufacturing process 40 nm | | Has a built-in GPU Yes |
| | Supports dynamic frequency scaling Yes | | Much lower typical power consumption 14.63W |
Cast your vote Do you agree or disagree with CPUBoss?
VS
Differences What are the advantages of each
| |||||||
| Significantly higher clock speed | 2.8 GHz | vs | 1.65 GHz | Around 70% higher clock speed | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Much more l2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | vs | 0.5 MB/core | 2x more l2 cache per core | |||
| |||||||
| Much newer manufacturing process | 40 nm | vs | 90 nm | A newer manufacturing process allows for a more powerful, yet cooler running processor | |||
| Has a built-in GPU | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; A separate graphics adapter is not required | |||
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Allows for maximum performance when needed, while conserving power and minimizing heat production when not needed | |||
| Much lower typical power consumption | 14.63W | vs | 68.25W | 4.7x lower typical power consumption | |||
| Has virtualization support | Yes | vs | No | Somewhat common; Boosts performance of virtual machines | |||
| Newer | Aug, 2011 | vs | Nov, 2000 | Release date over 10 years later | |||
| Significantly higher Maximum operating temperature | 90 °C | vs | 67.7 °C | Around 35% higher Maximum operating temperature | |||
| Much lower annual home energy cost | 4.34 $/year | vs | 20.24 $/year | 4.7x lower annual home energy cost | |||
| Much lower annual commercial energy cost | 15.77 $/year | vs | 73.58 $/year | 4.7x lower annual commercial energy cost | |||
| More cores | 2 | vs | 1 | Twice as many cores; run more applications at once | |||
Report a correction
Benchmarks Real world tests of Pentium 4 520 vs E 450
GeekBench (32-bit) Data courtesy Primate Labs
GeekBench
Specifications Full list of technical specs
summary | Pentium 4 520 | vs | E 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Clock speed | 2.8 GHz | 1.65 GHz | |
| Cores | Single core | Dual core | |
| Socket type | |||
| LGA 775 | |||
| Super 7 | |||
features | |||
| Has virtualization support | No | Yes | |
| Supports dynamic frequency scaling | No | Yes | |
power consumption | |||
| TDP | 84W | 18W | |
| Annual home energy cost | 20.24 $/year | 4.34 $/year | |
| Annual commercial energy cost | 73.58 $/year | 15.77 $/year | |
| Typical power consumption | 68.25W | 14.63W | |
details | Pentium 4 520 | vs | E 450 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Threads | 1 | 2 | |
| L2 cache | 1 MB | 1 MB | |
| L2 cache per core | 1 MB/core | 0.5 MB/core | |
| Manufacture process | 90 nm | 40 nm | |
| Max CPUs | 1 | 1 | |
| Operating temperature | Unknown - 67.7°C | Unknown - 90°C | |
integrated graphics | |||
| GPU | None | GPU | |
| Label | N/A | Radeon™ HD 6320 | |
| Latest DirectX | N/A | 11.0 | |
| GPU clock speed | N/A | 508 MHz | |
| Turbo clock speed | N/A | 600 MHz | |
bus | |||
| Clock speed | 800 MHz | 100 MHz | |
 Intel Pentium 4 520  Report a correction |  AMD E 450 Report a correction |
Follow us
Compare
Related Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $225 | ||
| 450 vs 3217U | ||
| | VS |  |
| $99 | ||
| 450 vs 2450M | ||
| | VS |  |
| 450 vs 350 | ||
| | VS |  |
| 450 vs 1800 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $236 | ||
| 450 vs T7500 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $75 | ||
| 450 vs 1007U | ||
| | VS |  |
| 450 vs 1200 | ||
Popular Comparisons
 | VS |  |
| $305 | $300 | |
| W3520 vs 2500 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 6200U vs 7th Gen A9-9410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $272 | $350 | |
| 4790K vs 6700K | ||
 | VS |  |
| $281 | ||
| 4200U vs 6410 | ||
 | VS |  |
| $180 | ||
| 3470 vs 5200 | ||
| | VS |  |
| $350 | ||
| 6700K vs 7th Gen A12-9700P | ||
 | VS |  |
| $125 | $50 | |
| 3220 vs 5300 | ||
